Representative Ihab Hamadeh described the agreement between Lebanon and Israel as “humiliating,” and said in a statement: “First: It is clear that this authority bears the responsibility of making every effort to keep the Israelis occupied and push them to complete their project of eradicating the largest component in Lebanon. Second: The withdrawal clause is the first clause necessary to complete the Iranian-American negotiations, and Netanyahu’s assertion that there will be no complete withdrawal is a violation of the completion of the first clause, which brings the situation in Hormuz back to square one. Third: Linking the withdrawal to disarming the party is another step that expresses the authority’s tendency toward internal conflict. Fourth: The authority does not have what the Israelis are asking for, and the resistance remains committed to its position in confronting the enemy until the entire land is liberated. Fifth: The agreement will remain a dead letter. Sixth: It can be considered an Israeli-Israeli agreement, which is a declaration of loyalty from the authority to Israel. Seventh: Joseph Aoun must know that the south is not his father’s farm.